House Roll Call #313

on LD 1932

April 2, 2008

 

While the overall total for today's enactment vote in the House was essentially identical to yesterday (97-46, vs. 97-45), there were some notable switches in the individual votes.

Today 63 Democrats voted for 1932, a net gain of five more than yesterday.
32 Republicans voted for 1932, a net loss of six from yesterday
2 Independents voted for 1932, one more than yesterday.

Seven Democrats, who voted yesterday to oppose, today switched to favor 1932:
            *CLARK of Millinocket, clarkhe@prexar.com
            *GROSE of Woolwich, RepCarol.Grose@legislature.maine.gov
            *HARLOW of Portland, charlow1@maine.rr.com
            *HASKELL of Portland, annehask@maine.rr.com
            *HINCK of Portland, RepJon.Hinck@legislature.maine.gov
            *MILLS of Farmington, jmills@mainelegal.net
            *SCHATZ of Blue Hill, bluehillfarm@gwi.net

Four Democrats, who were absent yesterday, voted today to support:
            BARSTOW of Gorham, (Y) crbarstow@gmail.com
            CONOVER of Oakland, (Y) RepJill.Conover@legislature.maine.gov
            KAENRATH of South Portland, (Y) BryanKaenrath@verizon.net
            TUTTLE of Sanford, (Y) RepJohn.Tuttle@legislature.maine.gov

Three Republicans, who yesterday voted to oppose 1932, today voted to support:
            *DUPREY of Hampden, repduprey@hotmail.com
            *LANSLEY of Sabattus, slansley2@aol.com
            *McKANE of Newcastle, Jon@jonmckane.com

One Independent, who yesterday voted to oppose 1932, today voted to support:
            *SAVIELLO of Wilton, drtom16@hotmail.com

One Republican, who yesterday was absent, today voted in support of 1932:
            *EMERY of Cutler, ianemery@ptc-me.net

[Please take a moment to thank the sixteen Representatives above]

Four Democrats, who yesterday voted to support 1932, today voted to oppose:
           *BLANCHARD of Old Town, rdblanch@localnet.com
            *FISCHER of Presque Isle, RepJeremy.Fischer@legislature.maine.gov
            *FISHER of Brewer, dustyfish@hotmail.com
            *HOGAN of Old Orchard Beach, ghogan@gwi.net

One Democrat, who was absent yesterday, voted today to oppose:
            DUNN of Bangor, (N) RepMichael.Dunn@legislature.maine.gov

Nine Republicans, who yesterday voted to support 1932, today voted to oppose:
            *CROSTHWAITE of Ellsworth, bcrosthwaite@verizon.net
            *FITTS of Pittsfield, RepStacey.Fitts@legislature.maine.gov
            *KNIGHT of Livermore Falls, LGary.Knight@usa.net
            *MAREAN of Hollis, lindonfarm@sacoriver.net
            *McDONOUGH of Scarborough, 
            *MOORE of Standish, garymooreforstandish@mycingular.blackberry.net
            *PINKHAM of Lexington Township, wrightfor88@tds.net
            *PLUMMER of Windham, RepG.Plummer@legislature.maine.gov
            *SARTY of Denmark, rwsarty@fairpoint.net

Three Democrats, who voted for 1932 yesterday, were absent today:
            *HAYES of Buckfield, terry@megalink.net
            *KOFFMAN of Bar Harbor, koffman@coa.edu
            *WEDDELL of Frankfort, RepLance.Weddell@legislature.maine.gov

 

One Republican, who yesterday voted for 1932, today was absent:

            *WALKER of Lincolnville, RepRobert.Walker@legislature.maine.gov